https://leaderandcabinet.blog.essex.gov.uk/2025/10/13/why-bigger-is-better-for-care-and-for-greater-essex/

Why bigger is better for care – and for Greater Essex

The latest research from Newton, commissioned by the County Councils Network, couldn’t be clearer. The way government chooses to reorganise local councils will have a profound and lasting impact on the most vulnerable people in our communities.

Local Government Reorganisation – the move from a two-tier local government structure to one-tier unitary councils - is not just about redefining structures and boundaries. It’s not even about politics. It’s about our residents. It’s imperative that we prioritise the quality of care services, manage the cost of delivering them and ensure we have enough skilled staff to support those who need help most.

That’s why we have consistently argued for a three-council model for Greater Essex as it meets the government’s own criteria for reorganisation. It is a fact that fewer, larger councils can deliver high-quality services efficiently and sustainably – a fact that is substantially backed up by this latest research.

Of course, there will always be some exceptions depending on specific areas, however the report warns of a ‘triple whammy’ if government allows multiple smaller councils to take on the responsibility for care. This includes the potential of worse services, higher costs and not enough staff. These are risks we as local government simply cannot afford to take.

Smaller councils - those with populations under 500,000 - would face higher care costs due to reduced purchasing power. They’d need hundreds of new senior staff at a time when recruitment is already a challenge. And they’d be more likely to struggle with demand, leading to expensive out-of-area placements and financial instability.

In contrast, larger councils would be better placed to manage demand, attract and retain skilled staff, and deliver care services that are not only good, but outstanding. In fact, the report shows that larger councils are more likely to receive top ratings from Ofsted for children’s services.

This is why I’m urging the government to stick to its original intention - to create strong, strategic councils that can deliver for their residents. The English Devolution White Paper set out a clear vision - ending the two-tier system and avoiding the fragmentation of vital services. That vision must not be watered down.

We know that change is needed. We support reorganisation. But it must be done in a way that protects services, supports staff and delivers value for money. Anything less risks leaving residents with poorer care, higher costs, and fewer people to help them.

Our proposal is built on evidence, experience and a deep understanding of what works. It aligns with the government’s own guidance and is backed by the latest research.

I urge ministers to make the right choice when reviewing proposals - for Greater Essex and for the country.

Read the Newton report - Local Government Reorganisation: Analysing the impact on people-based services - here.

Share this page

Leave a comment

We only ask for your email address so we know you're a real person